It’s easy to get into control struggles to defend our right to freedom when we already feel constrained and confined. In addition, with risk in the equation, what used to be a basic personal choice has now become our spouse’s concern and a potential area of conflict.
Typically, normal differences in risk taking between spouses come into play less often and more indirectly, such as when we are impacted by the fallout of what happens to our spouse from a decision they made. Or if our partner’s judgment affects our ability to trust that we can rely on them or feel secure.
But when it comes to decisions that directly risk our partner’s safety and life, one spouse’s greater risk tolerance forces the other to assume that same level of risk. A comparable situation is with affairs or sexual acting out that risks transmitting a sexually transmitted disease to a spouse. In these cases, “personal choices” are actually mutual decisions made without consensus or respect for the inherent responsibility that limits the right to personal freedom with certain decisions.
Our interconnectedness as human beings during the pandemic became conspicuous and at a new level. But it’s always been true. We know experientially that our own well-being and state of mind is more affected by the climate of the relationship than by whether we get to do something we want in the moment that divides us. But, when we feel restricted, trapped, or harbor resentments, we are vulnerable to engaging in struggles around autonomy and control.
The good news is that the current context lends itself to the approach competitive teams use for making strategic decisions. This approach is a tool that will help us now, and also provide a template to improve how we navigate conflict in the future. With this model, couples envision themselves on a team together competing with other couples in an event or challenge, and wanting to win.
Successful, winning teams know that team members are interdependent, and have different skills. They recognize and capitalize on each other’s strengths, factor in one another’s weaknesses, and take care of one other – creating better plays by working together towards a common goal.
This framework shifts our mindset to regain perspective – bringing into focus what really matters. Keeping our eye on the ball in this way not only pays off, but feels better than fueling resentment fanned by an equivalency notion of fairness (tit for tat) and sense of entitlement.
When we access our wise minds and get on the same side as our partner, the climate we live and breathe at home supports our equilibrium.
Imagine fast forwarding in time to predict how an action will play out.
How good will it feel afterwards to do something you want to do if it makes your spouse feel unsafe, or puts them at risk?
Will it be worth it?
We can de-escalate difficult conversations by making it explicit that we recognize the good in our spouse and their positive intentions towards us – instead of assuming the worst. This makes people feel understood and pulls for their better self.
“I know you care about me and don’t want me to feel anxious and unsafe. That affects how we both feel.” (Elicits perspective and defuses the control struggle.)
Or:
If your partner seems overly restrictive:
”I just want to take a walk and I know you feel unsafe with that. Is there anything I can do to make you feel safe with it?” (Respectful. Gives your partner some control.)
Neuroscience reminds us that we co-regulate one another. Our own state is affected by our partner’s. We sense and react imperceptibly on a neurobiological level to, even unexpressed, rejection. When we harbor anger, or don’t trust one another, it hurts both people – rendering it hard to make smart decisions that support the relationship and our own well-being. It’s important to be united, especially now, because how we get along affects our mental and physical health and powerfully impacts the way we feel day to day.
